For a secret

They still don't know. You've been deciding whether they should.

What would Jane Austen tell you the two rooms are? What would La Rochefoucauld? Assemble a council of history's sharpest minds, bring them what you have been performing, and hear them disagree about whether you tell, leave first, or keep managing both.

Two full sessions, free · Private to your account · Nobody reads a sitting

Join the first 200 people who would rather be disagreed with.

This council

  • Jane AustenJane Austen
  • La RochefoucauldLa Rochefoucauld
  • MachiavelliMachiavelli
  • Marcus AureliusMarcus Aurelius
  • Nobody else is in the room.

    A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it. Nothing is published, sold, or used to train anything. Encrypted at rest, keyed to you.

  • The sharpest minds of their age.

    Each advisor is one of the masters of their time, built from the work they left. Not a costume, not a living influencer, and not a panel of strangers who happen to argue.

  • Built to disagree.

    They ask first, hold a position, and refuse to flatter. That is in how they are built.

Why a council

The stress is not the secret. It is sitting with it alone.

Tell them or don't. Both cost. You can see the doors. You cannot tell which one is honesty and which one is getting caught on someone else's timetable. The longer you wait, the more they look the same.

  • 01 — The trade

    You don't know what you want the knowing to do.

    Not because you lack feeling. Because you have not named what they would do with the fact, or what you are using the silence to keep.

  • 02 — The comfort

    A part of you calls this protection.

    You are sparing them. You are waiting for the right moment. Both are comfort. Neither asks who is living in a story you have already left.

  • 03 — The room

    You need the masters of what people actually are.

    Austen, Rochefoucauld, Machiavelli, Aurelius — the sharpest minds of their age on performance, self-interest, and what you control. They will not protect the arrangement. They will still send you out with one action.

This council

This table, for these two rooms.

Austen, Rochefoucauld, Machiavelli, Aurelius — history's sharpest minds on the two rooms, and who is being managed. Change them if you want. They will not agree.

Your table  4 of 5 · Ready

The ChairThe Chair
Jane Austen
La Rochefoucauld
Machiavelli
Marcus Aurelius
5Empty

Machiavelli and Marcus Aurelius rarely agree. Good.

The room

Click a face to seat them. Click again to send them out.

Read the full profiles →

Or sit a ready-made council

Jane AustenLa RochefoucauldMachiavelliMarcus Aurelius

A sitting like this

They ask before they answer.

Most AI tells you to be honest when you're ready. A real council wants the facts first. This is how a sitting on a double life that has lasted three months reads.

Session · 3 advisors seated

I've been seeing someone for three months. My partner of five years doesn't know. The other person asked what this is.
The Chair
Before anyone speaks: when you are with your partner, what do you say you were doing those evenings? And the other person — did you tell them you were in something, or did you let them assume you were free?
I said work. I told the other person it was complicated. I didn't say five years.
Jane Austen
Complicated is a costume. You have two rooms, and you are performing in both. The person at home is living in a story you have already left. That is not a delay. It is a use.
La Rochefoucauld
You want the new person without being the one who ended the old. Those can both be true. The cruelty is making two people wait so you don't have to be seen.
Austen. I think I've already chosen the new one.
Machiavelli
Then stop managing the exit. Tell the five-year first, this week, in a room. The other person is not a secret. They are a decision you have not paid for. Do not let them hear it from someone else.

An example of how the room reads this. Not a sitting anyone sent in.

How a session runs

Question. Positions. Verdict.

Nobody advises until the facts are on the table. Then the room argues. Then one person rules.

  1. The Chair

    Before anyone speaks: when you are with your partner, what do you say you were doing those evenings? And the other person — did you tell them you were in something, or did you let them assume you were free?

    First

    The Chair asks.

    Two or three sentences from you. Then one or two precise questions back. Nobody advises until the facts are on the table.

  2. Jane Austen

    Complicated is a costume. You have two rooms, and you are performing in both. The person at home is living in a story you have already left. That is not a delay. It is a use.

    La Rochefoucauld

    You want the new person without being the one who ended the old. Those can both be true. The cruelty is making two people wait so you don't have to be seen.

    Then

    Your advisors take positions.

    Each reads the situation through their own lens. Two of them will disagree. You can press any of them by name. They hold their ground.

  3. DecisionTell your partner this week, in person. Do not wait for the other person to force it.
    ActionOne conversation. No speech about needing time. Then tell the other person what you actually are.
    BySunday

    Last

    The Chair rules.

    One decision, one concrete action, one deadline. The next morning the Chair writes, and the room continues.

Read this before you sit down

What the Council is not.

  • Not therapy.

    If you're struggling, please talk to a professional. The Council is for decisions, not healing, and it will say so if your situation needs more than a decision.

  • Not a yes-man.

    Most AI tells you what you want to hear. The Council is built to disagree with you when you're wrong, and to keep disagreeing when you push.

  • Not generic advice.

    Every answer is about your situation, your people, your constraints. If the Council doesn't know enough, it asks. It doesn't guess.

The difference is the room, not a costume prompt. Why this is not ChatGPT →

Pricing

Cheaper than one bad decision.

Two full sessions, free, with everything the room does. Then Member for 5 sessions a month, Plus for 5× that, Patron for 20×. Pay yearly and take 20% off. Patron names go on the wall — first 200.

Free

Try the room

$0

  • 2 full sessions, on the house — no expiry, no refill
  • A council of three to five advisors, built from what they wrote
  • The Chair asks first, then rules: one decision, one action, one date
  • Advisors that disagree and hold their ground — press any of them by name
  • Speak or type
  • The Chair writes the morning after a verdict
  • Every sitting saved, encrypted, and sealed to your account

Member

For a decision a week

$15/ month

Everything in Free, plus:

  • More usage — 5 full sessions every month
  • Refilled on the first of the month
  • Cancel any time

Plus

For the ones who come back

$28/ month

Everything in Member, plus:

  • 5× Member usage — 25 full sessions every month
  • Seminars — sit with one advisor and go into their thought
  • New advisors as they join

Patron

For the ones who keep it open

$78/ month

Everything in Plus, plus:

  • 20× Member usage — 100 full sessions every month
  • Your name on the wall — first 200
  • A say in who joins the Council next
See the wall →

Questions

Before you ask the Council.

  • Can't I just prompt ChatGPT?

    You can. You will get one voice, in costume, already inclined to agree with you. The Council seats three to five advisors built from what they actually wrote, makes them disagree, and ends with a decision you have to act on. That is a room. A prompt is not.

    The technical note →

  • Is this real AI, or people?

    AI advisors, each built on the actual writings and ideas of the person they're named after. They are built to ask first, disagree when they should, and never flatter. No person is sitting behind the names.

  • Why these advisors?

    Each one brings a way of reading a situation that the others don't. Power, self-control, incentives, reputation, courage, what people really want. Every one of them is in the public domain, and none of them will ever be swapped for a living influencer.

  • Is my situation private?

    Yes. A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it — not Theo, who built this, not a staff, not a partner. Nothing you write is published, sold, shared, or used to train a model. It is encrypted at rest, keyed to your account. The model sees a turn only to answer it. You can allow a thirty-day review to improve the room; that is off unless you switch it on.

    How a sitting is sealed →

  • Will they just agree with me?

    No. The Council is built so that advisors hold their positions when you push back. They'll concede a point, never the conclusion, unless you bring a fact that changes it.

  • When does the full app launch?

    The web version you're looking at is live now. Your first two full sessions are free, with everything the room does. After that, Member is $15 a month for five sessions a month, Plus $28 for 5× that (and seminars with one advisor), Patron $78 for 20× — first 200 names on the wall. Pay yearly and take 20% off. The mobile app comes later.