For a partner

Fifty-fifty. Only one of you is still building.

What would Adam Smith tell you that you are subsidizing? What would Confucius? Assemble a council of history's sharpest minds, bring them the months and the split, and hear them disagree about whether you rewrite, buy them out, or keep carrying two seats.

Two full sessions, free · Private to your account · Nobody reads a sitting

Join the first 200 people who would rather be disagreed with.

This council

  • Adam SmithAdam Smith
  • MachiavelliMachiavelli
  • ConfuciusConfucius
  • Benjamin FranklinBenjamin Franklin
  • Nobody else is in the room.

    A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it. Nothing is published, sold, or used to train anything. Encrypted at rest, keyed to you.

  • The sharpest minds of their age.

    Each advisor is one of the masters of their time, built from the work they left. Not a costume, not a living influencer, and not a panel of strangers who happen to argue.

  • Built to disagree.

    They ask first, hold a position, and refuse to flatter. That is in how they are built.

Why a council

The stress is not the company. It is sitting with it alone.

Rewrite or keep the fiction. Both cost. You can see the doors. You cannot tell which one is loyalty and which one is a one-person firm under a two-person contract. The longer you wait, the more they look the same.

  • 01 — The trade

    You don't know what the split still buys.

    Not because you lack a partner. Because every option asks you to give something up — the friend, the original bet, the story of two founders — and nobody has named the months.

  • 02 — The comfort

    There is a reason, and it is real.

    A baby, a dip, a season. Mutual friends will tell you to wait. That is not counsel. A room that only likes you will not help you move.

  • 03 — The room

    You need the masters of incentives and of duty.

    Smith, Machiavelli, Confucius, Franklin — the sharpest minds of their age on who benefits from the status quo, what a partner owes, and the sentence this week. They will still send you out with one action.

This council

This table, for this split.

Smith, Machiavelli, Confucius, Franklin — history's sharpest minds on the fifty-fifty that is no longer true. Change them if you want. They will not agree.

Your table  4 of 5 · Ready

The ChairThe Chair
Adam Smith
Machiavelli
Confucius
Benjamin Franklin
5Empty

Machiavelli and Confucius will fight about what you owe. Let them.

The room

Click a face to seat them. Click again to send them out.

Read the full profiles →

Or sit a ready-made council

Adam SmithMachiavelliConfuciusBenjamin Franklin

A sitting like this

They ask before they answer.

Most AI tells you to align. A real council wants the facts first. This is how a sitting on a cofounder who stopped shipping eight months ago reads.

Session · 3 advisors seated

We founded this two years ago, fifty-fifty. For eight months I've been the only one shipping. He still talks like a founder.
The Chair
Before anyone speaks: when did the work stop, in a week you can point to? And is there a conversation on paper, or only the original split?
Last autumn. He had a baby. I said take the time. There is no paper except the incorporation. He comes to the Monday and talks.
Adam Smith
You are subsidizing his title. Fifty-fifty was a bet on two people building. One person building is a different firm. The market has already priced this. You have not.
Confucius
Duty to a partner is real. So is the role. A founder who does not found has changed the role. Name it. A person of integrity does not carry two seats and call it loyalty.
Confucius. I don't want to be the one who punished him for having a child.
Benjamin Franklin
Then don't punish. Rewrite. One conversation this week: what he owns from now, in hours, with a date. Put it in a note after. If he cannot meet it, the split changes. A baby is not a reason to keep a fiction.

An example of how the room reads this. Not a sitting anyone sent in.

How a session runs

Question. Positions. Verdict.

Nobody advises until the facts are on the table. Then the room argues. Then one person rules.

  1. The Chair

    Before anyone speaks: when did the work stop, in a week you can point to? And is there a conversation on paper, or only the original split?

    First

    The Chair asks.

    Two or three sentences from you. Then one or two precise questions back. Nobody advises until the facts are on the table.

  2. Adam Smith

    You are subsidizing his title. Fifty-fifty was a bet on two people building. One person building is a different firm. The market has already priced this. You have not.

    Confucius

    Duty to a partner is real. So is the role. A founder who does not found has changed the role. Name it. A person of integrity does not carry two seats and call it loyalty.

    Then

    Your advisors take positions.

    Each reads the situation through their own lens. Two of them will disagree. You can press any of them by name. They hold their ground.

  3. DecisionStop running a one-person firm under a two-person contract.
    ActionMeet him. Name the eight months. Propose a new split or a new hours number, in writing, with a date.
    ByThis week

    Last

    The Chair rules.

    One decision, one concrete action, one deadline. The next morning the Chair writes, and the room continues.

Read this before you sit down

What the Council is not.

  • Not therapy.

    If you're struggling, please talk to a professional. The Council is for decisions, not healing, and it will say so if your situation needs more than a decision.

  • Not a yes-man.

    Most AI tells you what you want to hear. The Council is built to disagree with you when you're wrong, and to keep disagreeing when you push.

  • Not generic advice.

    Every answer is about your situation, your people, your constraints. If the Council doesn't know enough, it asks. It doesn't guess.

The difference is the room, not a costume prompt. Why this is not ChatGPT →

Pricing

Cheaper than one bad decision.

Two full sessions, free, with everything the room does. Then Member for 5 sessions a month, Plus for 5× that, Patron for 20×. Pay yearly and take 20% off. Patron names go on the wall — first 200.

Free

Try the room

$0

  • 2 full sessions, on the house — no expiry, no refill
  • A council of three to five advisors, built from what they wrote
  • The Chair asks first, then rules: one decision, one action, one date
  • Advisors that disagree and hold their ground — press any of them by name
  • Speak or type
  • The Chair writes the morning after a verdict
  • Every sitting saved, encrypted, and sealed to your account

Member

For a decision a week

$15/ month

Everything in Free, plus:

  • More usage — 5 full sessions every month
  • Refilled on the first of the month
  • Cancel any time

Plus

For the ones who come back

$28/ month

Everything in Member, plus:

  • 5× Member usage — 25 full sessions every month
  • Seminars — sit with one advisor and go into their thought
  • New advisors as they join

Patron

For the ones who keep it open

$78/ month

Everything in Plus, plus:

  • 20× Member usage — 100 full sessions every month
  • Your name on the wall — first 200
  • A say in who joins the Council next
See the wall →

Questions

Before you ask the Council.

  • Can't I just prompt ChatGPT?

    You can. You will get one voice, in costume, already inclined to agree with you. The Council seats three to five advisors built from what they actually wrote, makes them disagree, and ends with a decision you have to act on. That is a room. A prompt is not.

    The technical note →

  • Is this real AI, or people?

    AI advisors, each built on the actual writings and ideas of the person they're named after. They are built to ask first, disagree when they should, and never flatter. No person is sitting behind the names.

  • Why these advisors?

    Each one brings a way of reading a situation that the others don't. Power, self-control, incentives, reputation, courage, what people really want. Every one of them is in the public domain, and none of them will ever be swapped for a living influencer.

  • Is my situation private?

    Yes. A sitting is private to your account. Nobody reads it — not Theo, who built this, not a staff, not a partner. Nothing you write is published, sold, shared, or used to train a model. It is encrypted at rest, keyed to your account. The model sees a turn only to answer it. You can allow a thirty-day review to improve the room; that is off unless you switch it on.

    How a sitting is sealed →

  • Will they just agree with me?

    No. The Council is built so that advisors hold their positions when you push back. They'll concede a point, never the conclusion, unless you bring a fact that changes it.

  • When does the full app launch?

    The web version you're looking at is live now. Your first two full sessions are free, with everything the room does. After that, Member is $15 a month for five sessions a month, Plus $28 for 5× that (and seminars with one advisor), Patron $78 for 20× — first 200 names on the wall. Pay yearly and take 20% off. The mobile app comes later.